SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
INDIRABAI EKNATH WALSE AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
VITTHAL NAGARI SAHAKARI BANK LTD. LATUR AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['P B SHIRSATH', 'A N IRPATGIRE', '', 'R/ & SERVED']

1

1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.101/2008.

(Smt.Indirabai Walse and Ors. Vs. Vitthal Nagari Sahakari

Bank Ltd., Laur and Anr.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Office notes, office Memoranda of

Coram,appearances, Court’s orders

Court’s or Judge’s orders.

or directions and Registrar’s orders

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr.PB Shirsath, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr.AN Irpatgire, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.

___

CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.

DATE : 25th January, 2010.

...

1) Mr.Shirsath seeks to tender rejoinder on

behalf of the petitioners to refute the

contentions relating to grant of

certification under Section 101 of the

Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act

and the consequences arising therefrom.

2) Rejoinder accepted, copy of which is

received by other side.

3) Heard.

4) The petitioners herein feel that the

order of Division Bench in Writ Petition

No.2368/2007 dated 23rd April, 2007,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top