SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RANJIT BADRI ROY AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA – Respondent


Cri.Appeal No.132 of 2011

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.132 OF 2011

1.

Ranjit Badri Roy,

Age 23 years, Occu.Labour

2.

Sanjit Badri Roy,

Age 24 years, Occu.Labour

Both R/o Bharwaliya

Post Digwaliya, Taluka Sisawan,

District Siwan (Bihar),

At present Mangal Bazar, Jalna,

Taluka and District Jalna

..APPELLANTS

(Orig.Accused)

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra

..RESPONDENT

Mr Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for appellants

Mrs V.A.Shinde, Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent-State

CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND

A.V. POTDAR, JJ

DATE : 11th April 2012

ORAL JUDGMENT

1.

The appellants, who stand convicted for offence punishable

under Section 302 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to

imprisonment for life and to each pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to

undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months, by the

Additional Sessions Judge-1, Jalna by judgment dated 15.1.2011, by

this appeal question the correctness of their conviction and sentence.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top