HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
RANJIT VELYA PARADKE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 4506/2021
['Girase Amarjitsing B', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'CHAUDHARI V S R/FOR AND']
968-wp-4506-21 (+10)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4506 OF 2021
Ranjit Velya Paradke
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4522 OF 2021
Rakesh Bachhu Tamaychekar
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4523 OF 2021
Jamsing Kalya Pawara
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4524 OF 2021
Simabai Karamsing Chaudhari
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
1 of 4
968-wp-4506-21 (+10)
2
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4525 OF 2021
Ramsing Bapu Rahase
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4526 OF 2021
Tersing Bawa Patle
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4527 OF 2021
Khumsing Nayaka Pawara
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4528 OF 2021
Subhash Kella Padvi
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4529 OF 2021
Sangitabai Rohidas Pawara
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
... Respondents.
2 of 4
968-wp-4506-21 (+10)
3
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4530 OF 2021
Shiva Kella Tadvi
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 4531 OF 2021
Brijlal Bola Pawara
... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
….
Mr. A.B. Girase, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 is all WPs.
Mr. P.S. Patil, Addl.G.P. and Ms. V.S. Chaudhari, Advocate for
Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 / Zilla Parishad in respective WPs.
….
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 11th MARCH, 2021
PER COURT:-
1.
Mr. Girase, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
proposals for bifurcation of the Grampanchayats has been forwarded
by the Grampanchayats. Thereafter, the B.D.O. has forwarded the said
proposal to the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer of
the Zilla Parishad forwarded the same to the Divisional Commissioner,
Nashik with his recommendation. The Divisional Commissioner,
3 of 4
968-wp-4506-21 (+10)
4
Nashik in turn forwarded the same to the Additional Chief Secretary,
Rural Development Department, Mumbai in September, 2020, the
same is pending. The elections would be due in July, 2021.
2
The learned counsel submits that respondent Nos.1 and 2 be
directed to take decision upon it within a period of two months.
3.
Learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
4.
In case, the proposal for bifurcation of the Grampanchayats as
claimed are forwarded by the Divisional Commissioner and is pending
with respondent No.2, then respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall take
decision upon it as per the procedure contemplated under the
provisions of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act expeditiously
and preferably within three (03) months from today.
5.
The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE
JUDGE
S.P. Rane
4 of 4