SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PARASHRAM KACHRU RODE AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAT DEVIDAS SALUNKE – Respondent


Advocates:
['KUTE RAJENDRA L', 'AUTADE KAIAS B', '', 'R/ SOLE SERVED']

1

W.P.No.2886/12

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.2886 OF 2012

Office Notes, Office

Memoranda of Coram,

appearances, Court's

orders or directions

and

Registrar's

orders.

Court's or Judge's orders

Mr.R.L.Kute, advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr.K.B.Autade, advocate for Respondent No.1.

CORAM : A.A.SAYED,J.

Date : 13.08.2013.

PER COURT :

1.

The order impugned in this Petition is that of the trial Court

dated 15.12.2012 whereby the Application of the

Respondent/original plaintiff for amendment of the Plaint came to

be allowed.

The Petitioners/original defendant Nos.1 to 7 have

filed this Petition challenging the aforesaid order granting the

amendment.

2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioners at the out-set fairly

stated that the Petitioners have no grievance so far as amendment

granted in respect of boundaries of the suit properties. The

grievance of the Petitioners is essentially in res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top