Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J
The Secretary, Dayanand Education Society, Latur – Appellant
Versus
Gangadhar Sambhaji Deshmukh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. analysis of appellant's employment rights and reinstatement criteria. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's evaluation of procedural and jurisdictional issues regarding employment. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. determination and award of compensation under employment regulations. (Para 8) |
| 4. final ruling and conclusion regarding the petitions. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
1. The petitioners in the first petition are the management and Principal of the educational institution, who are aggrieved by the judgment dated 6.11.1996, delivered by the School Tribunal, Aurangabad, by which, Appeal No.156 of 1995, filed by respondent No.1 was allowed and he was granted reinstatement as a Full Time Lecturer in Philosophy (against S.T. category), for the academic year 1995-96. Respondent No.4 in the first petition has filed the second petition, challenging the same judgment of the School Tribunal, being apprehensive that if respondent No.1/ employee / original appellant is reinstated, he is likely to lose his employment.
2. By order dated 6.2.1997 the learned Division Bench of his Court admitted the Writ Petition and stayed the impugned judgment by granting interim relief in terms of prayer clause (B) i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
