SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
JAMSING KALYAN PAWARA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 4523/2021



Advocates:
['Girase Amarjitsing B', 'CHAUDHARI V S R/', '', 'COPY SERVED ON GP']

968-wp-4506-21 (+10)

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 4506 OF 2021

Ranjit Velya Paradke

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4522 OF 2021

Rakesh Bachhu Tamaychekar

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4523 OF 2021

Jamsing Kalya Pawara

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4524 OF 2021

Simabai Karamsing Chaudhari

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

1 of 4

968-wp-4506-21 (+10)

2

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4525 OF 2021

Ramsing Bapu Rahase

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4526 OF 2021

Tersing Bawa Patle

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4527 OF 2021

Khumsing Nayaka Pawara

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4528 OF 2021

Subhash Kella Padvi

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4529 OF 2021

Sangitabai Rohidas Pawara

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others

... Respondents.

2 of 4

968-wp-4506-21 (+10)

3

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4530 OF 2021

Shiva Kella Tadvi

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 4531 OF 2021

Brijlal Bola Pawara

... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

and others

... Respondents.

….

Mr. A.B. Girase, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 is all WPs.

Mr. P.S. Patil, Addl.G.P. and Ms. V.S. Chaudhari, Advocate for

Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 / Zilla Parishad in respective WPs.

….

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND

SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 11th MARCH, 2021

PER COURT:-

1.

Mr. Girase, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

proposals for bifurcation of the Grampanchayats has been forwarded

by the Grampanchayats. Thereafter, the B.D.O. has forwarded the said

proposal to the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer of

the Zilla Parishad forwarded the same to the Divisional Commissioner,

Nashik with his recommendation. The Divisional Commissioner,

3 of 4

968-wp-4506-21 (+10)

4

Nashik in turn forwarded the same to the Additional Chief Secretary,

Rural Development Department, Mumbai in September, 2020, the

same is pending. The elections would be due in July, 2021.

2

The learned counsel submits that respondent Nos.1 and 2 be

directed to take decision upon it within a period of two months.

3.

Learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

4.

In case, the proposal for bifurcation of the Grampanchayats as

claimed are forwarded by the Divisional Commissioner and is pending

with respondent No.2, then respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall take

decision upon it as per the procedure contemplated under the

provisions of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act expeditiously

and preferably within three (03) months from today.

5.

The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA )

JUDGE

JUDGE

S.P. Rane

4 of 4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top