SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
NATHAJI RUNJAJI HIWRALE – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent


{1}

wp283112.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.2831 OF 2012

   

Nathaji Runjaji Hiwrale,

age: 60 years, Occ: Business,

R/o Ambedkar Nagar, 

Near Jadhavwadi, Aurangabad. 

Petitioner

Versus

1 State Bank of India,

   constituted under State Bank

   of India Act, 1955, having its

   local Head Office at Bandra­

   Kurla Complex, Mumbai 

   and

   its Administrative Office at

   CIDCO, Aurangabad, through

   Assistant General Manager

   (Administration), CIDCO,

   Aurangabad.

2 Police Commissioner, 

   Aurangabad.

3 Police Inspector,

   CIDCO Police Station,

   Aurangabad.

4 City and Industrial Development

   Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.,

   A company incorporated under 

   the Companies Act 1956, having

   its branch office at CIDCO Bhavan,

   Aurangabad, through its 

   Administrator, Aurangabad.

Respondents

{2}

wp283112.odt

Mr.R.R.Mantri,  advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.V.J.Dixit, Senior Counsel holding for Mr.L.D.Vakil, advoc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top