ANNASAHEB KARBHARI TRIBHUVAN – Appellant
Versus
SADHANA ANNASAHEB TRIBHUVAN – Respondent
1
wp2648.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2648 OF 2011
_____________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office |
Memoranda of Coram, |
appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders
orders or
|
directions and |
Registrar's orders |
_____________________________________________________________________
Mr. V.M. Kagne, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2011
Heard. Advocate Mr. Kagne states that the
petitioner-husband is not disputing the quantum of
maintenance. But grievance is about the date from which
it is awarded. Proceedings for divorce under Section
12(1)(b)(d) r/w Section 5(b) (c) of the Hindu Marriage Act,
1955 are instituted by the petitioner-husband in 2009 and
in those proceedings, the respondent-wife appeared, filed
her written statement on 07.01.2010 but did not claim any
interim maintenance. Application claiming that
maintenance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.