SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANNASAHEB KARBHARI TRIBHUVAN – Appellant
Versus
SADHANA ANNASAHEB TRIBHUVAN – Respondent


1

wp2648.11

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 2648 OF 2011

_____________________________________________________________________

Office Notes, Office |

Memoranda of Coram, |

appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders

orders or

|

directions and |

Registrar's orders |

_____________________________________________________________________

Mr. V.M. Kagne, Advocate for petitioner.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2011

Heard. Advocate Mr. Kagne states that the

petitioner-husband is not disputing the quantum of

maintenance. But grievance is about the date from which

it is awarded. Proceedings for divorce under Section

12(1)(b)(d) r/w Section 5(b) (c) of the Hindu Marriage Act,

1955 are instituted by the petitioner-husband in 2009 and

in those proceedings, the respondent-wife appeared, filed

her written statement on 07.01.2010 but did not claim any

interim maintenance. Application claiming that

maintenance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top