Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
KISHORE C. SANT, J
Sunil Bapurao Gawalwad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. detailed allegations describe the second marriage and involvement of the petitioners. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. defence arguments could not override evidence supporting process issuance. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. judicial scrutiny and proper application of mind are required for process issuance. (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
1. Heard learned advocates for the parties. Taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.
2. The petitioners/accused persons against whom an order of issuance of process is passed are before this Court. Against the petitioner No. 1 the process is issued for the offence punishable under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “I.P.C.”) and against petitioner Nos. 2 to 15 the process is issued for the offence punishable under Section 109 of the I.P.C. by order dated 15.09.2012 in R.C.C. No. 109/2011 by the learned J.M.F.C., Kandhar. There is long history before passing of this order. Initially, respondent No. 2-wife filed complaint in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Kandhar against the petitioners and one Pushpa @ Pinki w/o Sunil Gawalwad for the offence punishable under Section 494 of the I.P.C. Accused No. 2 - Pushpa who is not before this Cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
