HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
CHAITANYA GANGADHAR JOSHI AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
APPLN 1104/2022
['DESHMUKH ARVIND S', 'COPY SERVED ON P P', '', 'Tripathi Manish P']
appln-1104-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1104 OF 2022
1.
Chaitanya s/o Gangadhar Joshi
2.
Gangadhar s/o Kamlakar Joshi
3.
Vibha w/o Gangadhar Joshi
4.
Vaishali d/o Gangadhar Joshi
5.
Rupali d/o Gangadhar Joshi
.. Applicants
Versus
1.
The State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Station,
Sailu, Dist. Parbhani
2.
Rutuja Chaitanya Joshi
.. Respondents
...
Mr. A. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicants.
Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for respondent No.1 - State.
Mr. M. P. Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2022.
ORDER :- [Per Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.]
.
Present application has been filed by invoking the inherent
powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure for quashing the FIR bearing Crime No.384 of 2021
registered with Sailu Police Station, Dist. Parbhani on 25.12.2021
for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 498-A, 504, 506
read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short "IPC") as well
(1)
appln-1104-2022.odt
as the Charge-sheet No.80 of 2022 filed before the learned Judicial
Magistrate First Class, Sailu.
2.
Applicant Nos.1 is the husband of respondent No.2. Applicant
No.2 is the father-in-law of respondent No.2. Applicant No.3 is the
mother-in-law of respondent No.2 and applicant Nos.4 and 5 are
the sisters-in-law of respondent No.2.
3.
Heard learned Advocate Mr. A. S. Deshmukh for the
applicants, learned APP Mr. R. D. Sanap for respondent No.1 - State
and learned Advocate Mr. M. P. Tripathi for respondent No.2.
4.
The informant - respondent No.2 lodged report with Sailu
Police Station, Dist. Parbhani on 25.12.2021 against the present
applicants stating that the marriage of the informant was performed
with applicant No.1 on 14.05.2019 as per Hindu rites and customs
at Sailu. At the time of marriage, her parents gave 20 gm. Gold
and Rs.2,00,000/- cash as dowry as well as necessary items for the
house. After the marriage, she resided at her matrimonial home at
village Wakad Tq. Risod for one month. Thereafter, she along with
her husband went to Akola, where her husband was serving. Out of
the said wedlock, she had begotten one daughter namely Dnyanda.
It is further stated that after the marriage all the applicants used to
harass the informant physically and mentally on one or the other
(2)
appln-1104-2022.odt
pretext. It is further stated that applicant No.1 and his family has
about 28 acres of land which is of good quality. The financial
condition of the father of the informant is not good. Applicant
Nos.4 and 5 used to say to the informant that she should not have
married to their brother as her family is not financially good as
compared to their family. Thereafter, it is stated that applicants
used to ask her to bring amount of Rs.5,00,000/- from her parents
for construction of house at Akola and on that count, applicants
used to harass her physically and mentally. They used to abuse her
and starve her. Applicant No.1 always used to say that he don't like
him. Whenever she used to talk to her parents about the
harassment by applicants, they used to persuade the applicants.
Thereafter on 16.03.2020, the informant gave birth to a girl child at
Sailu. All the applicants abused the father of the informant by
saying that why did she given birth to a girl child. It is further
stated that the parents of the informant sent her to village Wakad
to cohabit with her husband. Thereafter, for some days, she was
treated properly. Then again they started harassing her. It is
further stated that in November 2020, applicant No.1 taken her to
cohabit, but he never treated her as wife. On 05.02.2020,
applicants drove her out of the house on the ground that why she
didn't bring Rs.5,00,000/- and then abused her, assaulted her and
haras