HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
LIMBA NIVRUTTI RAKH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 10039/2014
(1) W.P. No. 2384 of 2011 & Group
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Writ Petition No. 2384 of 2011
With
Ambadas Maruti Wanve
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10032 of 2014
With
Raghunath s/o. Parshuram Shinde.
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10033 of 2014
With
Govind s/o. Dnyanoba Rakh
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10034 of 2014
With
(2) W.P. No. 2384 of 2011 & Group
Shahurao s/o. Abaji Rakh
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10035 of 2014
With
Ginandeo s/o. Raoji Rakh.
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10036 of 2014
With
Gahininath s/o. Deorao Rakh
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10037 of 2014
With
Vishnu s/o. Nivrutti Rakh.
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
(3) W.P. No. 2384 of 2011 & Group
Writ Petition No. 10038 of 2014
With
Shrirang s/o. Narayan Rakh.
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10039 of 2014
With
Limba s/o. Nivrutti Rakh.
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10040 of 2014
With
Raghunath s/o. Bayaji Badage,
Died through Shantabai Raghunath Badage.
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Writ Petition No. 10041 of 2014
Jaganath s/o. Dhondiba Pawar
.. Petitioner.
versus
(4) W.P. No. 2384 of 2011 & Group
The State of Maharashtra & others.
.. Respondents.
.........................
Mr. P.D. Bachate, Advocate, for petitioners in
all petitions.
Mr. D.R. Kale, Mr. G.R. Ingole, and
Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government
Pleaders, for the respondents viz. State & its authorities.
..........................
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER 2014
COURT'S ORDER :
1.
Heard Adv. Mr. P.D. Bachate for the petitioners, and learned
AGPs Mr. D.R. Kale, Mr. G.R. Ingole and K.J. Ghute Patil, for the
respondent - State.
2.
Petitions are filed by the persons claiming to be freedom
fighters, challenging orders withdrawing the pension released in their
favour, consequent to the report submitted by One Man Committee,
popularly known as ‘Justice A.B. Palkar Committee’. Adv. Mr. Bachate
makes a statement that these petitioners have not approached this Court at
any time prior to filing of these petitions.
3.
The learned Assistant Government Pleader has invited
attention to judgment delivered on 25th September 2012, in Writ Petition
No. 6318 of 2010, and other connected matters. He points out, one of us
(5) W.P. No. 2384 of 2011 & Group
[B.P. Dharmadhikari, J] is party to that judgment. A later Division Bench
judgment dated 16th June 2014, delivered in Writ Petition No. 1916 of
2011, and other connected matters, is also pressed into service. According
to the learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.