SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DAYANAND S/O MADHAVRAO TAKLE and ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['GASTGAR SANTOSH B', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'SANTOSH BHOSALE']

1

905-appln.1646.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1646 OF 2015

DAYANAND S/O MADHAVRAO TAKLE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Gastgar Santosh B.

APP for Respondents: Mr.U.H.Bhogale.

Advocate for first informant : Mr. Santosh Bhosale.

...

CORAM :

V. M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATE :

08th April, 2015.

Per Court:

1

By the present application, the Applicants are seeking anticipatory

bail since they are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime

No.7 of 2015, registered at Umri Police Station, Taluka Umri, District

Nanded, for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471,

419 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2

I have head Mr.S.B.Gastgar, learned counsel for the Applicants,

Mr. U.H.Bhogale, learned APP and Mr.Santosh Bhosale, learned counsel

for the first informant, in detail

3

The first informant is one Raju Vitthalrao Dhage. Admittedly, this

first informant is having no concerned whatsoever in respect of the

property of deceased Fulsing Lobha Rathod. However, it appears that as

a diligent citizen, he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top