SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BALASAHEB RAGHUNATH HARAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHA and ORS – Respondent


1 wp 5535.03

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 5535 OF 2003

Balasaheb S/o Raghunath Haral,

Age : 33 Years, Occu. : Agri. & Upa-Sarpanch,

R/o Gundegaon, Tq. &

Dist. Ahmednagar.

.. Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra

Through the Chief Secretary,

Government of Maharashtra,

Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

2.

The Chief Minister,

State of Maharashtra,

Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

3.

The Cabinet Minister,

Department of Agriculture,

Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

4.

The Cabinet Minister,

Department of Rural Development,

Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

5.

The Secretary,

Department of Agricultural,

Mantralaya, Mumbai.

6.

The Secretary,

Department of Rural Development,

Mantralaya, Mumbai.

.. Respondents

2 wp 5535.03

Shri Santosh S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, Addl.G.P. for Respondents/State.

WITH

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3801 OF 2015

IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 5535 OF 2003

Maharashtra Rajya Krishi Seva

Maha Sangh Pune through its

Joint Secretary

Mr. Bhimrao Vasantrao Kulkarni

.. Applicant

Versus

1.

Balasaheb S/o Raghunath Haral

an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top