SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KIRANSING YOGRAJSING PARIHAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['BRAHME SHAILESH P AND A R SYED', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'PATALE AMOL N V P', 'PATALE AMOL N', 'AGP', 'R NO', 'served', 'PATIL JITENDRA V']

1 wp 1205.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 1205 OF 2021

Kiransing Yograjsing Parihar,

Age : 65 Years, Occu. : Agriculturist,

R/o Parihar Chowk, House No. 14,

Dharangaon, Tq. Dharangaon,

District Jalgaon.

.. Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

Through Secretary,

Urban Development Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai – 32.

2.

The Assistant Town Planner,

Jalgaon, Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon.

3.

Dharangaon Municipal Council,

Dharangaon, Tq. Dharangaon,

District Jalgaon,

Through its Chief Officer.

4.

The Sub Post Master,

Post Office, Dharangaon,

Tq. Dharangaon, Dist. Jalgaon.

5.

The Chief Post Master,

Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad.

.. Respondents

Shri A. R. Syed, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Shri S. G. Sangle, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1.

Shri Jitendra V. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3.

Shri Amol Patale, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

The Respondent No. 2 is served.

2 wp 1205.21

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND

R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE :

23RD AUGUST, 2021.

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S. V. Gangapurwala, J.) :-

.

Rule. Rule m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top