SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
NANDKUMAR TUKARAM HELWADE AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['Tripathi Manish P', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'AGP', 'CHANDAK RAVIRAJ R']

WP5692-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 5692 OF 2022

1.

Nandkumar s/o Tukaram Helwade

Age 58 years, Occu; Agril.

2.

Madhusudan s/o Tukaram Helwade,

Age 61 years, Occu: Agril.

3.

Manohar s/o Tukaram Helwade

Age 85 years, Occu: Agril.

... Petitioners

4.

Rushabh s/o Shamsundar Helwade,

Age 29 years, Occu: Agril.

5.

Krishnakant s/o Sanjay Helwade,

Age 29 years, Occu: Agril.

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

Through the Secretary

Urban Development Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai-32

2.

The Municipal Council, Sailu

Tq. Sailur District Parbhani

Through its Chief Officer.

... Respondents

Mr. Manish R. Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners,

Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, for respondent No. 1- State

Mr. Raviraj R. Chandak, Advocate for respondent No.2

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL &

Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE

: 14.12.2022

Page 1 of 6

WP5692-22

JUDGMENT ( Per Y. G. Khobragade, J.):

1.

We have heard learned counsel for both sides.

2.

Rule, made

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top