SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADHUKAR ANANDRAO PAHURKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['THOMBRE S S', '', 'SHINDE CHANDRAKANT K', 'MAHAJAN SUREKHA P AND SANDIP RATHOD', '', 'GP', 'MAHAJAN SUREKHA P', 'ADV SUREKHA MAHAJAN', 'MARLAPALLE YUGANT R']

1 wp 4328.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 4328 OF 2016

Madhukar Anandrao Pahurkar

.. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

Mr. Chandrakant K. Shinde, Advocate for the

Petitioner.

Mr. V. S. Badakh, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1.

Mr. Yugant R. Marlapalle, Advocate for Respondent

Nos. 2 and 3.

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &

R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATE:

17

th DECEMBER, 2018

PER COURT :

1.

Mr. Shinde, learned Advocate for the

petitioner submits that at the relevant time the

petitioner was working as 'Junior Clerk'. The

departmental enquiry was initiated against him, so

also, criminal case was filed on the charge of

accepting gratification. The learned Advocate

submits that upon conclusion of the departmental

enquiry, the enquiry report was submitted by the

2 wp 4328.16

enquiry officer to the discplinary authority,

however the petitioner was not given copy of the

enquiry report. The petitioner was convicted in

the criminal case on 29.07.2003. The learned

Advocate submits

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top