SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
NAGNATH GYANBA JADHAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['DHONGADE SURESH D', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'AGP']

1 WP / 4572 / 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 4572 OF 2019

Nagnath S/o Gyanba Jadhav,

Age : 66 years, Occu : Retired

Samata Niwas in front of Civil

Court, Tq. Ausa, District – Latur

.. Petitioner

Versus

1] The State of Maharashtra,

Through : Secretary,

Revenue Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai – 32.

2] The Commissioner,

Aurangabad Division,

Aurangabad

3] The Collector,

Latur

.. Respondents

...

Advocate for petitioner : Mr. S.D. Dhongade

AGP for the respondent – State : Mrs. R.P. Gour

...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL &

SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ.

DATE

: 30 SEPTEMBER 2022

ORAL ORDER (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) :

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Mrs. Gour, AGP

waives service for the respondent – State. At the joint request of the

parties, the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.

2 WP / 4572 / 2019

2.

By the present petition, the petitioner challe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top