SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARANSING KACHRUSING KAKAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['PATUNKAR SWAPNIL S', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'G P', 'BAJAJ ANIL S']

4783.17wp

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.4783 OF 2017

Karansingh s/o Kachrusing Kakas,

Age: 54 years, Occ: Business,

R/o. Golewadi, Aurangabad.

District Aurangabad.

..PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra

Through its Secretary,

Urban Development Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai & ors.

..RESPONDENTS

Mr Swapnil S. Patunkar, Advocate for petitioner;

Mrs A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent NOs. 1

to 4;

Mr A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.5

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE

AND

MANGESH S. PATIL,JJ.

DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2018

ORAL ORDER :

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the

petitioner.

2.

Learned Counsel appearing for the

petitioner, by inviting our attention to the

pursis filed on behalf of the petitioner, submitted

4783.17wp

(2)

that present Writ Petition No.4783 of 2017 though

was tagged along with bunch of petitions namely

Writ Petition No.4955 of 2017 and other writ

petitions on 3rd December, 2018, present petition

could not be placed before this Court. He then

sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top