HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
RANI TUKARAM KSHIRSAGAR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 4581/2015
1 919WP4581.2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 4581 OF 2015
1. Rani D/o. Tukaram Kshirsagar,
Age : 23 years, Occu. Household,
R/o. Bobadewadi, Tq. Kaij,
Dist. Beed.
2. Shrinivas S/o. Vitthalrao Bobade,
Age : 27 years, Occu. Nil,
R/o. As above.
….. Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through : The Secretary,
Urban Development Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai.
2. The Block Development Officer,
Panchayat Samiti, Kaij,
Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed.
3. Grampanchayat Bobadewadi,
Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed,
Through its Gramsevak
4. Mahadeo S/o. Bhaskar Karpe,
Age : 22 years, Occu. Student,
R/o. Bobadewadi, Tq. Kaij,
Dist. Beed.
5. Narayan S/o. Nagorao Borul,
Age : 25 years, Occu. Agril,
R/o. As above.
….. Respondents
..........
Shri. Manish P. Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners
Shri. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for respondent/State
Shri. P. P. Dama, Advocate for respondent No. 2
Shri. B. M. Dhanure, Advocate for respondent no. 3
Mrs. Sonawane h/f Shri. B. R. Kedar, Advocate for respdts No. 4 & 5
.............
2 919WP4581.2015
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE
AND
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATE : 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2019
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.] : -
1.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with
the consent of the parties and taken up for final disposal at admission
stage.
2.
Admitted controversy is raised in the petition by way of a
challenge to the appointment dt. 30.03.2015 issued in favour of
respondents No. 4 and 5, for the post of Gram Rojgar Sevak and
Peon, respectively. The facts which are not in dispute are, the Gram
Panchayat Bobadewadi, Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed, thought it fit to appoint
the eligible candidates for the posts of Gram Rojgar Sevak and Peon.
Accordingly, the Public Proclamations dt. 15.01.2015 for the said
posts were issued and the same were affixed on the Notice Board.
Copy of these Public proclamations are annexed to the petition at
Exh. B. Perusal of the proclamation for the post of Gram Rojgar
Sevak shows that, the minimum qualification for the said post was
12th std. passed. Subsequently, by way of Corrigendum dt.
13.03.2015, it is stated that in the earlier proclamation an error
occurred in respect of the minimum qualification and though it is
3 919WP4581.2015
stated in the earlier proclamation dt. 15.01.2015 that the requisite
qualification for the post of Gram Rojgar Sevak as 12th std. passed,
the minimum qualification for the said post be read as 10th std.
passed and it is in view of the Government Circular. The corrigendum
was also affixed on the Notice Board. In accordance with the said
proclamation/advertisement, the petitioners (who happen to be the
husband and wife) submitted their applications for the post of Gram
Rojgar Sevak and Peon. In their applications, they submitted that
they possess requisite qualification and they be considered for the
said posts.
3.
The Gram Sabha was held on 27.03.2015 in the office
premises of Gram Panchayat, Bobadewadi, under the Chairmanship
of Smt. Sumitra Jalindar Tonde, wherein two subjects namely
appointments to the posts of Gram Rojgar Sevak and Peon, were
taken up. Copy of the Resolution dt. 27.03.2015 passed in the said
Gram Sabha is placed on record at Exh. D. Perusal of the said
Resolution shows that, for the first subject i.e. appointment to the
post of Gram Rojgar Sevak, the Gram Sabha had a discussion about
the qualification of the candidates.
4.
It is stated in the said Resolution that, in all three
applicants had submitted applic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.