SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
VIJAY S/O. JAGANNATH KHAPARE AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent
APPLN 1159/2020



Advocates:
['SALUNKE SUDARSHAN J', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', '', 'KEDAR BALBHIM R', 'FOR RESPONDENT NO']

- 1 -

criappln1159.20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1159 OF 2020

1.

Viay s/oo jagaannat h apar

aga 29 yars, occ. Srvic

r/oo Canara Bank, D awal Cornr

Branc CIDCO, Nandd.

2.

C aya w/oo jagaannat h apar

aga 55 yars, occ. Hous old

3.

Jagaannat s/oo Sud akar h apar

aga 60 yars, occ. Agaril.

4.

Vis al s/oo Jagaannat h apar

aga 25 yars, occ. Education

Applicant Nos. 2 to 4 r/oo Sakla Plot

Dnyans war Nagaar, Parb ani

5.

Vars a w/oo Sandip Hr

aga 35 yars, occ. Hous old

r/oo c/oo Sandip Hr, 247-1

Jawalal Panc al, Tq. halamnuri

Dist. Hingaoli

6.

Sandp s/oo Dagadappa Hr

aga 40 yars, occ. Srvci

r/oo 247-1, Jawala Panc al

Tq. halamnuri, Dist. Higaoli

Applicants

Vrsus

1.

T Stat of Ma aras tra

2.

Sow. S ivprma w/oo Viay h apar

aga 23 yars occ. Hous old

r/oo c/oo D ondiram Somnat appa Indral

Jai Matadi Niwas, halpana Nagaar,

- 2 -

criappln1159.20.odt

B ind Z.P. latur, Dist. Latur.

Rspondnts

Mr. S.J. Salunk, Advocat for t applicants.

Mr. B.V. Vird , APP for rspondnt No. 1.

Mr. B.R. hdar, Advocat for rspondnt No. 2.

CORAM : T.V. Nalawad &

M.G. Swlikar, JJ.

DATE : 5t January, 2021.

JUDGMENT : (Pr M.G. Swlikar, J.)

1.

Rul. Rul mad rturnabl fort wit .

2.

By consnt, ard fnally at admission staga.

3.

T is is an application undr Sction 482 of t Cod of

Criminal Procdur for quas inga of t c arga-s t and First

Information Rport No. 120/o2020 datd 18.03.2020 rgaistrd wit

S ivaji Nagaar Polic Station, Latur, Dist. Latur for t offnc

punis abl undr Sction 498A, 323, 504 rad wit Sction 34 of t

Indian Pnal Cod.

4.

Rspondnt No. 2 lodgad First Information Rport agaainst

t applicants allgainga t at applicant No. 1 is t usband of

- 3 -

criappln1159.20.odt

rspondnt No. 1, applicant No. 2 is t mot r, applicant No. 3 is

t fat r, applicant No. 4 is t brot r, and applicant No. 5 is t

marrid sistr of applicant No. 1. Applicant No. 6 is t usband of

applicant No. 5. it is allgad in t First Information Rport by

rspondnt No. 2 t at s was maintaind wll for a priod of 6 to 10

days aftr marriaga and t raftr on trivial garounds, all t

applicants startd arassinga r. Applicant No. 1 usd to bat r

undr infunc of alco ol in t odd ours of t niga t. All t

applicants startd tauntinga r on r looks. Applicant Nos. 2 to 5

usd to say t at t y wr not proprly onourd in t marriaga.

T y usd to say t at s s ould bringa gaold and silvr articls from

r parnts. On 23.11.2018, applicant No. 1 lockd r in t ous

at Nwasa, District A mdnagaar. On 27.11.2018, rspondnt No. 2

informd about t arassmnt to r fat r and t raftr r

fat r cam to Nwasa. T rupn applicant No. 1 turnd r and

r fat r out of t ous. Sinc t n, s as bn stayinga at

Latur. On t s allgaations, First Information Rport cam to b

lodgad on 18.03.2020, on t basis of w ic , offnc as aforasid

cam to b rgaistrd agaainst all t applicants.

5.

Hard S ri Salunk, larnd counsl for t applicants,

- 4 -

criappln1159.20.odt

S ri Vird , larnd APP for t Stat and S ri hdar, larnd

counsl for rspondnt No. 2.

6.

Larnd counsl S ri Salunk submittd t at vagau and

ganral allgaations ar mad agaainst t applicants. H submittd

t at applicant No. 1 as fld ptition for divorc agaainst rspondnt

No. 2. Aftr srvic of notic of t ptition for divorc, rspondnt

No. 2 as fld t is complaint. H argaud t at on t basis of vagau

and ganral allgaations, no offnc could b mad out agaainst t

applicants. T rfor, t cas is squarly covrd by t dcision of

t Honourabl Suprm Court in t cas of Stat of Hariyana Vs.

C . B ajan Lal and ot rs rportd in AIR 1992 Suprm Court 604.

7.

Larnd APP S ri Vird and larnd counsl S ri hdar

submittd t at spcifc allgaations av bn mad agaainst t

applicants. Rspondnt No. 2 was subjctd to crulty by t

applicants. T y submittd t at offnc undr Sction 498A of t

Indian Pnal Cod and ot r offncs ar clarly mad out agaainst

t applicants.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top