SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

TUKARAM SUDAM MUNDHE AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH – Respondent


Advocates:
['MURKUTE J M', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'M B VAISHNAV APPOINTED', 'A K CHITNIS']

CR.APPEAL NO.324/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.324 OF 2012

1.

Tukaram s/o Sudam Mundhe,

Age 31 years, Occu. Agri.,

r/o Margalwadi, Tq. Gangakhed.

2.

Sudam s/o Dattarao Mundhe,

Age 66 years, Occu. & r/o as above.

3.

Kausalyabai w/o Sudam Mundhe,

Age 63 years, Occu. Household,

r/o as above.

4.

Dnyanoba s/o Sudam Mundhe,

Age 36 years, Occu. Agri.,

r/o as above.

...APPELLANTS

(Ori.Accused)

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra,

Through Police Station Gangakhed,

Tq. Gangakhed, Dist. Parbhani.

...RESPONDENT

...

Mr. J.M.Murkute, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. V.G.Shelke, APP for respondent State.

Mr. A.K.Chitnis, Adv., for the complainant.

...

CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.

DATE : January 3rd, 2013

***

CR.APPEAL NO.324/2012

(2)

ORAL JUDGMENT:

1.

Heard.

2.

In Sessions Case No.26/2010, the learned

Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge recorded

conviction for offense under Sections 307, 498-A

read with Section 34 of IPC, 506-II read with

Section 34 of IPC, by order dated 18/4/2012.

Appellant No.1 Tukaram was directed to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for ten years, three years,

three years, three ye

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top