SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHHAYA W/O VILAS CHOUDHARI – Appellant
Versus
VILAS S/O PRABHAKAR CHOUDHARI AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['BIDE DNYANESHWAR A', '', 'SEEMA T PAWAR', 'FOR PETITIONER CONSENT OBTAINED', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'ADHAV D R']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

29 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 550 OF 2016

Chhaya W/o Vilas Choudhari,

Age : 34 years, Occu.: Household,

R/o.: C/o.: Laxman Kadu Mahajan,

Khadka Road, Ramdaswadi, Bhusawal,

Tq. Bhusawal, District : Jalgaon.

….

Petitioner

Versus

1.

Vilas s/o Prabhakar Choudhari,

Age : 54 years, Occu.: Photographer,

R/o.: Near Shrikrushna Mandir,

Budhwar Peth, Savda, Tq. Raver,

District : Jalgaon.

2.

The State of Maharashtra

(Deleted in view of order

dated 17.07.2018)

… Respondents

...

Mr. D. A. Bhide, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. D. R. Adhav, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 18.02.2019

ORAL JUDGMENT :-

Heard.

2.

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

3.

The learned advocate for respondent No.1 waives service.

2

29 wp 550-16

With consent of both sides the matter is heard finally at the

stage of admission.

4.

In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is the wife of the

respondent No.1 is impugning the order passed by the Judicial

Magistrate F. C. in Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 1116

of 2009 dated 4 Ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top