Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J
AHEMAD SHAHA MAQBOOL SHAHA – Appellant
Versus
MUBARAK SHAHA S/O IBRAHIM SHAHA AND OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion reached by the court regarding the rejection of the bail cancellation applications. (Para 1 , 8) |
| 2. context of the bail applications and surrounding facts regarding the death of the informant's daughter. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. arguments presented by both sides regarding the relevance of evidence in the bail decisions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's observations on the reasons and considerations applied by the lower court. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER :
1. Both the applications have been filed by the original informant under Section 439 (2) of Cr.P.C.
2. The respondent No.1 in ACB No.95 of 2021 is the husband of the deceased, whereas the respondents in ACB No.96 of 2021 are the brothers-in-law, father-in-law, mother-in-law of the deceased. The present applicant/original informant lodged the FIR vide Crime No.312 of 2020 with Bidkin Police Station, Aurangabad Rural, District Aurangbad, on 03-12-2020 against THE respective respondents under Section 304B, 498A, 323, 504 r.w.34 of IPC. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad granted bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in Bail Application No.233 of 2021 to the respondent husband Salim on 24-02-2021 and as regards the other respon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
