SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SUNIL CHAGAN BAVISKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS – Respondent


( 1 )

wp6653.22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 6653 OF 2022

Sunil Chagan Baviskar

..

Petitioner

Age. 48 years, Occupation : Service,

R/o. Hated (BK.), Tq. Chopda,

Dist. Jalgaon.

Versus

1]

The State of Maharashtra

..

Respondents

Through its Secretary,

Social Justice and Special Assistance

Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400032.

2]

The Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe,

De-notified, Nomadic Tribes,

Other Backward Classes and

Special Backward Category,

Divisional Caste Scrutiny Committee,

Nandurbar, Tq. & Dist. Nandurbar.

3]

Nutan Dnyanmandir,

Adawad, Tq. Chopda, Dist. Jalgaon,

Through its Head Master.

Mr.Mohit S. Shah, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.G. Sangle, AGP for the respondent/State.

CORAM

:

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &

ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATED

:

30.06.2022

( 2 )

wp6653.22

O R D E R [PER : ANIL L. PANSARE,J.] :-

01.

Leave to amend prayer clause granted. The amendment be

carried out forthwith.

02.

Issue notice to respondent Nos.1 and 2. The learned AGP waives

service of notice for respondent Nos.1 & 2. We do not intend to issue notice to

respondent No.3, as the petition could be disposed off by issuing appropriate

di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top