SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
RANDEEPSINGH ISHWARSINGH SARDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['GRANTHI MANPREET AJEET SINGH', '', 'BHOSALE MAHESH KALIDAS', 'COPY SERVED ON P P']

921-aba-660-2022.odt

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.660 OF 2022

Randeepsingh Ishwarsingh Sardar

...Applicant

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Mahesh K. Bhosle, Advocate for the applicant.

Ms. V.S. Choudhari, APP for the respondent-State.

...

CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.

DATED : 30th JUNE, 2022.

PER COURT:-

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the

learned APP for the State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that

name of the applicant is not named in the FIR. However, in a

supplementary statement of the injured, his name came to the light

first time in the month of July 2021. The applicant has played no role

in the alleged incident. He has been arraigned as an accused only on

suspicion and having some cases registered against him. The police

have adopted an easy way to arraign the accused as there are crimes

to his discredit. The similarly situated persons more particularly the

person causing simple injury have been released on anticipatory bail.

The investigation is completed and nothing is to be recovered and

dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top