Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
VIBHA KANKANWADI, J
SAYYED JAVED ALI ANSAR ALI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis for bail cancellation is the seriousness of charges and evidence. (Para 1) |
| 2. discussion on mcoca applicability and interpretations regarding organized crime. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments highlighting failure to properly consider relevant evidence. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. emphasis on eyewitness accounts and the necessary criteria for bail decisions. (Para 9) |
ORDER :
1. Present application has been filed by the original informant under Section 439 (2) of Cr.P.C . to challenge the order dated 05-05-2021 passed in Criminal Bail Application No.325 of 2021 by learned Special Judge, MCOC Act, Beed, in Crime No.403 of 2019, registered with Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Beed, for the offence punishable under Section 302, 143, 147, 120-B, 201, 195-A of Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/25, 4/25 of the Arms Act, r.w. Section 7 of the Criminal Amendment Act, read with Section 135, 37 (1), 37 (3) of the Maharashtra Police Act, read with Section 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 .
2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Menezes Joslyn A.for applicant, learned Advocate Mr. A. N. Sabnis for respondent No.2, and learned APP Mr. V. M. Kagne fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
