HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
BHIMDEO RATTU RATHOD AND ORS – Respondent
FA 3420/2018
['GOVT PLEADER', 'V D GUNALE', '', 'ADV V G GUNALE', 'BUT CAVT FILED ONLY']
1
First Appeals 3420 n 3421 of 2018.odt
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
FIRST APPEAL NO. 3420 OF 2018
1.
The State of Maharashtra,
Through its District Collector,
Aurangabad.
2.
The Special Land Acquisition Officer,
Jayakwadi Project Division No.1,
Aurangabad.
3.
The Executive Engineer,
Minor Irrigation Division No.1,
Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.
… APPELLANTS
(Original Opponents)
V E R S U S
1.
Bhimdeo s/o Rattu Rathod
Age: 28 years,
2.
Megha Rattu
3.
Neelabai w/o Rattu
All residents of Kolwadi Tanda,
Taluka Kannad, District Aurangabad.
… RESPONDENTS
(Original Claimants)
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 3421 OF 2018
1.
The State of Maharashtra,
Through its District Collector,
Aurangabad.
2.
The Special Land Acquisition Officer,
Jayakwadi Project Division No.1,
Aurangabad.
2
First Appeals 3420 n 3421 of 2018.odt
3.
The Executive Engineer,
Minor Irrigation Division No.1,
Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.
… APPELLANTS
(Original Opponents)
V E R S U S
Pandu Haru Mamtibai w/o Haru,
Age-48 Yrs, Occu. Agril.,
Resident of Kolwadi Tanda,
Taluka Kannad, District Aurangabad.
… RESPONDENT
(Original Claimant)
…
Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for Appellants.
Mr. Vikas G. Kodale, h/f Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for
Respondents/Original Claimants.
...
CORAM
: SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.
RESERVED ON
: 29th November, 2021
PRONOUNCED ON : 09th March, 2022
JUDGMENT:
.
The State has preferred these two appeals feeling
aggrieved by the common impugned judgment and award passed by
the Reference Court in LAR No.05 of 2013 and LAR No.06 of 2013
under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter
referred to as the “said Act” for the sake of convenience). Both
appeals can be disposed of by common judgment.
3
First Appeals 3420 n 3421 of 2018.odt
2
The following factual scenario would cover the dispute in
narrow compass:
1)
Name of the Village :-
Kolwadi Tanda, Taluka Kannad,
District Aurangabad.
2)
Gat Number
Acquired Area
301
1 H 56 R
301
1 H 98 R
301
2 H 00 R
3)
Date of Notification U/s. 4 of L.A. Act
Date: 31-7-1995
published in Mah. Gov. Gazette
4)
Date of Notice U/s.4 of L.A. Act received
Date: 02-4-1998
by the claimants.
5)
Date of possession of the land taken
Date: 09-4-1996
by the Ex. Engg. by private negotiation
6)
Date of Award U/sec. 11
Date 25-7-2000
7)
Date on which Notice of the award u/s.
Date: 22-1-2001
12(2) received by the claimants.
8)
Date of payment of compensation
Date: 24-1-2001
The lands were acquired for minor irrigation project.
3
In LAR No.05 of 2013, the Special Land Acquisition
Officer was pleased to fix the market price at the rate of Rs.59,400/-
for 1 H 98 R classifying it as Jirayat land (Rs.300/- per R). The
Reference Court enhanced the same at Rs.2,500/- per R. In LAR
No.06 of 2013, the Special Land Acquisition Officer was pleased to
award the compensation at the rate of Rs.3,750/- per R thereby
determining the valuation of the acquired land at Rs.2,85,000/- apart
from valuation of trees.
4
First Appeals 3420 n 3421 of 2018.odt
4
Heard Mr. Virdhe, AGP for Appellants/State and Mr. Vikas
Kodale, holding for Mr. V. D. Gunale, learned counsel for respondents/
original claimants.
5
Mr. Virdhe, learned AGP invited my attention to the
impugned judgment paragraphs 19 to 24. He submitted that the
original claimants have placed on record two sale instances in support
of their claim for enhancement of compensation. One sale instance is
of dated 15th April, 1997 for 4 R land, which cannot be taken into
consideration as a base to determine the compensation. The
Reference Court has also observed to that effect in paragraph 21 and
not acted upon. He further pointed out that the second sale instance
is of dated 22nd April, 1998 for 20 R land for consideration of
Rs.50,000/-. He submitted that Section 4 notification came to be
published in the Government Gazette on 31st July, 1997 and public
notice u