SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BAPU SHANKAR DIKHE AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SURYAWANSHI SANKET N', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'GP', 'SHERMALE K N', 'R/ SERVED']

1 pil-25.19_wt_wp3180.21_j_.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.25 OF 2019

1.

Bapu Shankar Dighe

)

Age 46 years, Occu. Agri.

)

R/o Dhanore, Tq. Rahuri,

)

Dist. Ahmednagar

)

2.

Shri Dadasaheb Kusabapu Pawar

)

Age 40 years, Occu. Agri.

)

R/o Pawar Wasti, Kolhar Road

)

Tambhere, Tq. Rahuri,

)

Dist. Ahmednagar

)..

Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra

)

Through the Principal Secretary

)

Revenue & Forest Department,

)

Mantralaya, Mumbai -32.

)

2.

The Hon’ble State Minister

)

Revenue and Forest Department

)

Mantralaya, Mumbai -32.

)

3.

The Divisional Commissioner

)

Nashik Division, Nashik.

)

4.

The Collector, Ahmednagar

)

Dist. Ahmednagar

)

2 pil-25.19_wt_wp3180.21_j_.doc

5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer

)

Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar.

)

6.

The Tahsildar, Rahata,

)

Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar,

)

7.

Pradeep Bhausaheb Ghuge

)

Age 42 years, Occ. Business,

)

R/o. Malunja, Tq. Sangamner

)

D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top