SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJU VITHAL WAGHULE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


1 Cri. Appln. 2743-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2743 OF 2016

1] Raju S/o Vitthal Waghule

2] Vimal W/o Raju Waghule

3] Sandhya W/o Madhukar Bhalerao

4] Asmita @ Pramila W/o

Pramod Bhuyagale

.. Applicants

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

.. Respondent

.....

Mr. S.P. Tilve, Advocate for the applicants

Mr. S.Y. Mahajan, APP for the respondent-State

......

CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 30/06/2016

ORAL ORDER :

Heard.

2.

The applicants are seeking pre-arrest bail

in Crime no.73 of 2016 registered at Jawahar Nagar

Police Station, Dist. Aurangabad for the offences

punishable under section 307, 498-A of the Indian

Penal Code.

2 Cri. Appln. 2743-2016

3.

In the FIR, specific role is attributed to

each of the applicants, however, in the statement of

the complainant recorded under section 164 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, he has absolved all the

applicants.

4.

Having regard to the statement under

section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and

its evidential value, in my view, it will be

appropriate to release all the applicants on bail.

5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top