SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
PIYUSHA PRAKASH YENKURE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 5209/2013



Advocates:
['JADHAVAR PRATAP V', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'COPY SERVED ON STANDING COUNSEL', 'SCRUTINY COMMITTEE/ R NO', 'G P', 'S S TOPE', 'SALVE AVINASH R', 'DAYANAND B BHANGE', 'TELE ASHOK B']

wp5209.13.doc

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 5209 OF 2013

Piyusha d/o Prakash Yenkukre

Under Guardian of father

Prakash s/o Ganpatrao Yenkure

age 48 years, occ. Service

r/o Borul, Tq. Devni, Dist. Latur.

.. PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra

Through its Secretary

Medical Education and Drugs Department

Mantralaya, Mumbai 32.

2.

The Director,

Medical Education & Research

Mumbai

Through, The Dean

Government Medical College,

Aurangabad.

3.

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny

Committee, Aurangabad.

Through its Deputy Director ®.

4.

The Dean / Principal

Seth G.S. Medical College & K.E.M. Hospital

Parel, Mumbai.

5.

The Registrar,

Maharashtra University of Health Sciences

Nashik.

.. RESPONDENTS

Mr. P. V. Jadhavar, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S. K. Kadam, AGP for the State.

Mr. A. B. Tele, advocate for respondent no. 2.

Mr. S. S. Tope, advocate for respondent no. 3.

Mr. K. C. Sant, advocate for respondent no. 5.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 2620 OF 2014

Vivekkumar s/o Sayanna Adpod

age 19 years, occ. Student

r/o 35 Gokunda, Tq. Kinwat

Dist. Nanded.

.. PETITIONER

wp5209.13.doc

2

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra

Through its Secretary

Medical Education and Drugs Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai 32.

2.

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny

committee No. 2, Aurangabad

Through its Deputy Director (R)

3.

The Dean

Swami Ramanand Tirth Rural

Government Medical College,

Ambajogai, Dist. Beed.

4.

The Registrar,

Maharashtra University of Health

Sciences, Nasik, Dindori Road,

Nasik, Nasik.

.. RESPONDENTS

Mr. P. V. Jadhavar, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S. K. Kadam, AGP for the State.

Mr. K. D. Bade Patil, advocate for respondent no. 1.

Mr. V. M. Mane, advocate for respondent no. 2.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 5516 OF 2013

Kum. Pooja D/o Prakash Chavan

age 17 years (Minor), Occ. Education

Through natural guardian i.e. father

Shri Prakash Ashroba Chavan

age 50 years, occ. Service,

r/o Eknath Nagar, Parbhani

Tq. & Dist. Parbhani.

.. PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra

Through Principal Secretary,

Medical Education Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai 32.

2.

Director of Medical Education & Research

CET Cell, Opp. Government Dental College

& Hospital Building, St. George's Hospital

Compound, Near CST Railway station

wp5209.13.doc

3

Mumbai 400 001.

3.

Government Medical College,

Aurangabad.

Through its Dean/Registrar

4.

Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny

Committee, Aurangabad

Through its Member Secretary.

.. RESPONDENTS

Mr. M. S. Deshmukh, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S. K. Kadam, AGP for the State.

Mr. A. R. Salve, advovcate for respondent no. 4.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 2797 OF 2014

Kum. Ashvini Devidas Pawar

age 17 years (minor), occ. Education

r/o Ashok Nagar, Basmath,

Tq. Basmath, Dist. Hingoli

At Present r/o Latur,

Tq. & Dist. Latur

Through her natural guardian

i.e. father

Shri Devidas Rajabhau Pawar

age 43 years, occ. Service

r/o Basmath, Dist. Hingoli

.. PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

Maharashtra University of Health

Sciences, Nashik

Vani Raod, Nashik

through its Registrar.

2.

Maharashtra Institute of Medical

Science & Research Medical College

& Hospital, Ambajogai Road,

Latur, Dist. Latur

through its Dean

3.

Scheduled Tribe Certificate

Scrutiny Committee,

Aurangabad.

Through its Member Secretary.

.. RESPONDENTS

Mr. M. S. Deshmukh, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. C. A. Jadhav, advocate for respondent no. 1.

wp5209.13.doc

4

Mr. P. S. Patil, advocate for respondent no. 3.

=====

CORAM : R.M. BORDE &

V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.

DATE : 12th AUGUST, 2014.

ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER R. M. BORDE, J. )

1.

Heard.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the

parties, petitions are taken up for final disposal at admission stage.

3.

Petitioners claim to be belonging to Scheduled Tribe category. Since

petitioners have secured admission to medical course as against the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top