SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
GOKUL MOHAN FALAK – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS – Respondent


- 1 -

wp6707.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 6707 OF 2022

Gokul S/o Mohan Falak

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others

Respondents

Mr. A. D. Shinde, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. D. R. Kale, GP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &

ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATE : 30th JUNE, 2022.

PER COURT :

1.

The petitioner has put forth prayer clauses ‘B’ and ‘C’ as

under :-

B)

Issue a writ of mandamus or any other

appropriate writ, order or directions in the nature of

writ of mandamus thereby directing the respondent

No. 1/Hon’ble Minister for Revenue Mantralaya,

Mumbai to decide the revision fled by the petitioner

u/sec. 257 of the M.L.R. Code on 23.1.2020 as

expeditiously as possible as this Hon’ble Court may

deem ft.

C)

Pending hearing and fnal disposal of the writ

petition as well as the revision preferred by the

petitioner before the respondent No. 1 the Hon’ble

- 2 -

wp6707.22.odt

Minister for Revenue, Mantralaya Mumbai, grant stay

to the operation, implementation and execution of

order dt. 19.9.2019 passed by the respondent no. 2 in

RTS Rev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top