SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SAHEBRAO HARI PATIL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


1 Cri. Appln. 3092-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3092 OF 2016

Sahebrao Hari Patil

.. Applicant

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

.. Respondent

.....

Mr. D.A. Mane, Advocate h/f Mr. Milind Patil, Advocate

for the applicant

Mr. S.Y. Mahajan, APP for the respondent-State

......

CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 27/06/2016

ORAL ORDER :

Heard.

2.

The applicant, who is aged about 75 years,

is seeking pre-arrest bail in Crime no.8 of 2015

registered at Pimpalgaon Hareshwar Police Station,

Tq. Pachora, Dist. Jalgaon for the offences

punishable under section 406, 408, 409, 465, 467,

468, 471, 474, 477, 420, 120(B) r/w. 34 of the

Indian Penal Code.

2 Cri. Appln. 3092-2016

3.

The investigation in the matter is complete

and after filing chargesheet, supplementary

chargesheet is also filed. The role attributed to

the present applicant is in the capacity of office

bearer of the trust, which is receiving grant-in-aid

for managing the hostel and institution.

4.

Prima faice, from the record, it appears

that the entire record is available

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top