Prasad Anil Mahamine vs The State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S. G. Chapalgaonkar, J
Prasad Anil Mahamine – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs. Sunita G. Sonawane
For the Respondents: Mr. K. S. Patil, APP, Mr. P. S. Dighe

Table of Content
1. allegations of rape and extortion through threats. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the nature of relationships and accusations. (Para 5 , 6)
3. the court's evaluation of evidence and procedural considerations regarding bail. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. conditions for granting bail to protect prosecution interests. (Para 12)
5. final order granting bail to the applicant. (Para 13)

ORDER:-

1. By this application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant seeks regular bail in Crime No.2095 of 2020 registered with Shrirampur (City) Police Station, Dist. Ahmed- nagar for the offences punishable under Sections 376 , 376 (2) (n), 376 (D) 385, 386, 420, 323, 120(B), 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The investigation was set in motion on the information given by the victim. In nutshell she alleged that the applicant/accused is conversant with her since school days. In the year 2014, she had mar- ried, but there was matrimonial discord in the year 2016. The accused developed contact with her under pretext that he can arrange for a job with help of his contacts in Pune. In August 2018, the informant went to Pune for interview as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BENCH AT AURANGABADS. G. Chapalgaonkar, JPrasad Anil Mahamine – AppellantVersusThe State of Maharashtra – Respondent

BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S. G. Chapalgaonkar, J
Prasad Anil Mahamine – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent