SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SACHIN OMPRAKASH BAJAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['BHANDARI ANAND P', 'DEVE S S', '', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', 'GP']

wp6889.15

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.6889 OF 2015

Sachin Omprakash Bajaj,

Age : 36 YEARS, Occu. Agriculturist,

R/o Zenda Chowk,

Majalgaon, Tq. Majalgaon, Dist. Beed

..PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra,

Through its Secretary,

Industries and Labour Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai-32

2.

Sub-Divisional Officer and

Land Acquisition Officer,

Ambajogai, Dist. Beed

3.

Maharashtra Industrial Development

Corporation, Aurangabad

Through its Divisional Officer

4.

Sub-Divisional Officer,

Majalgaon

..RESPONDENTS

Mr A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for petitioner;

Mr S.R. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1, 2 & 4;

Mr S.S. Deve, Advocate for respondent no.3

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE

AND

S. G. MEHARE, JJ.

DATE : 24th August, 2021

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.)

1.

Leave to add Sub-Divisional Officer, Majalgaon as respondent no.4.

Addition be carried out forthwith. Issue notice to respondent no.4. The

learned A.G.P. waives service and causes an appearance on behalf of

said respondent.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top