BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J
Sampat S/O Shankar Patare – Appellant
Versus
Sachin s/o Genuji More – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and encroachment details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants' argument on possession. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
ORDER :
1.By the present second appeal the appellants are challenging the Judgment passed on 10/04/2023, by the learned District Judge - 3, Ahmednagar in Regular Civil Appeal No.117 of 2020, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 29/03/2018, passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Rahuri in Regular Civil Suit No.802 of 2013, declaring the plaintiff to be the owner of the suit property and directing the defendants to deliver the possession of the suit property to the plaintiff within three months from the date of the decree, and that the defendants are restrained perpetually from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession over suit property and for mesne profits.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the second appeal can be summarized as under :-
The plaintiff filed suit for restoration of possession and perpetual injunction as regards the open plot property having dimension of 180.6 square meter, situated at village Vambori. It is contended by the plaintiff that the suit property is a open premises owned by the plaintiff. On 05/05/2012 t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.