SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ARUN BANSHI GHOLAP – Appellant
Versus
PRASAD SADASHIV CHOUDHARI AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SALUNKE SUDARSHAN J', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'PATIL B N', 'FOR R NO', 'PP']

1 599-13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 599 OF 2013

Arun Banshi Gholap

R/o Aher Dhanora

Taluka & District: Beed

... Petitioner

Versus

1.

Prasad Sadashiv Chaudhari

Gat No.30, Vinayak Nagar

Beed Bypass Road,

Behind Hotel Madhuban, Aurangabad

Tq. & District: Aurangabad.

2.

Kailas s/o Vitthal Dhongade

R/o Shastri Nagar, Aurangabad

Taluka & District: Aurangabad

3.

Rajiv s/o Kisan Tayade

R/o Mrutunjaya Nagar

Satara Parisar, Aurangabad

Taluka & District: Aurangabad.

... Respondents

Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke for the petitioner

Mr. B. N. Patil for Respondent No.1

Mr. B. L. Dhus, APP for the respondent-State

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J.

DATE

: 13th February, 2014

ORDER:

1.

The petition is filed to challenge the judgment and order of criminal

1/8

2 599-13

Revision No. 8 of 2013 which was pending before the Additional Sessions

Judge, Beed. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has set aside the order

made by the learned JMFC in Criminal A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top