Advocates:
['JADHAV SATEJ S', '', 'S S PANALE', 'PP', '', 'R/ SERVED', 'R S DESHMUKH']

CRI.REVN-359-2004.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2004

Vitthal S/o Dhondiram Sonawane

]

Age : 55 Years, Occu.: Agri.,

]

R/o : Jirewadi, Tq. Parali,

]

Dist. Beed.

]

… Applicant

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra

]

2.

Limbaji S/o Sonba Sonawane

]

Age : 50 Years, Occu. : Agril.,

]

R/o Bhabhalgaon, Tq. Ambajogai,

]

Dist. Beed.

]

… Respondents.

. . .

Mr. Satej S. Jadhav, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. S. P. Tiwari, APP for Respondent – State.

Mr. Kunal Kale, Advocate h/f. Mr. R. S. Deshmukh, Senior Counsel for

Respondent No.2.

. . .

CORAM : BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.

RESERVED ON : 12^th AUGUST 2022

PRONOUNCED ON : 18^th AUGUST 2022

JUDGMENT :

Vide order dated 31^st January 2005 rule was issued.

2.

By way of present Revision filed under section 397, 401 and 482

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant is challenging the order

passed below Exhibit-23 in Summary Criminal Case No. 907 of 1998, whereby

his application for recalling of the process issued by the learned Magistrate for

1/6

CRI.REVN-359-2004.odt

the offences punishable under sections 194 and 199 of Indian Penal C