SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
JANABAI D/O. MADHUKARRAOKOLTE UNDER GUARDIANSHIP HER FATHER M.G.KOLTE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['BHARASWADKAR RAGHVENDRA N', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'SK CHAVAN', 'DHORDE VIKRAM R']

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.329 OF 2009

Janabai d/o Madhukarrao Kolte

APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Another

RESPONDENTS

.......

Mr. R.N.Bharaswadkar, Advocate for applicant

Mr. B.J.Sonawane, APP for respondent State

Mr. V.S.Kadam h/f Mr.V.R.Dhorde, Advocate for Respondent No.2

.......

[CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.]

DATE: 8th March 2010

PER COURT:

1.

By the present revision application, u/s 401 of the

Criminal Procedure Code, the applicant, original complainant, has

challenged the judgment of acquittal dated 12.12.2008 passed by

learned Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.

09/2008 whereby the respondent No.2 is acquitted of the offence

punishable u/s 376, 506 of the Indian Penal Code .

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP

and learned counsel for respondent No.2. With their assistance

perused the impugned judgment.

3.

While considering the revision for admission it is

necessary to consider three points. This is a case where alleged

offence is u/s 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. It is allege

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top