SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
RANGNATH SAHEBRAO JADHAV and ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['R G HANGE', '', 'B N PALVE', 'SA DESHMUKH & RS DESHMUKH', 'COPY SERVED ON P P']

cria568.03

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.568 OF 2003

1) Rangnath s/o Sahebrao Jadhav,

Age-48 years, Occu:Agriculture,

R/o-Kumbharwadi, Tq-Georai,

Dist-Beed,

2) Radhakisan s/o Sahebrao Jadhav,

Age-38 years, Occu:Agriculture,

R/o-Kumbharwadi, Tq-Georai,

Dist-Beed.

...APPELLANTS

(Orig. Accused)

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra

...RESPONDENT

...

Mr. Govind Kulkarni Advocate h/f. Mr. R.S.

Deshmukh Advocate for Appellants.

Mr. R.V. Dasalkar, A.P.P. for Respondent.

...

CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATE OF RESERVING JUDGMENT : 19TH JULY,2016

DATE OF PRONOUNCING JUDGMENT: 3RD AUGUST, 2016

cria568.03

2

JUDGMENT :

1.

The appellants - original accused

(hereafter referred as "accused") have been

convicted in Sessions Case No.161 of 2002 by IVth

Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Beed on 5th

August 2003 for offence punishable under Section

307 and Section 324 read with 34 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC" in brief).

2.

The case of prosecution, in short, is a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top