BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
JEEVAN VINAYAK JAHAGIRDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR AND OTHERS – Respondent
.. 1 ..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1107 WRIT PETITION NO.9106 OF 2021
Jeevan Vinayak Jahagirdar
.. Petitioner
Versus
The Director,
Directorate of Marketing and Others
.. Respondents
…
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Chetan T. Jadhav
AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar
...
CORAM
: S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE
: 16-12-2021
PER COURT :
1.
Heard Mr. Jadhav, learned Advocate for the petitioner and
Mr. Chapalgaonkar, learned Advocate for respondent no.3.
2.
It appears that the interlocutory orders are being litigated
between the parties by filing the writ petition and other proceedings.
Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act provides that the civil
revision application or the petition shall not be entertained against
interlocutory orders of a Commercial Court including an order on the
issue of the jurisdiction, and any such challenge, subject to the
provisions of Section 13, shall be raised only in an appeal against the
Gajanan
.. 2 ..
decree of the Commercial Court. Section 13 of the Commercial
Courts Act provide
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.