{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17384 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 20366 OF 2020 Dyanoba Pundalik Yemale Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. P. C. Mayure, advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent No.1.

Mr. M. C. Swami, advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 04th January, 2023.

PC :

Heard rival submissions.

The applicant is seeking permission to withdraw entire amount of compensation which the appellant-acquiring body has deposited in this Court.

The learned Counsel for the acquiring body strongly opposed the application on the ground that the Reference Court has granted exorbitant amount of compensation.

However, it seems that the Reference Court has {2}

granted compensation roughly fve times more than the compensation granted by the SLAO.

Under such circumstances, the applicant is permitted to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount along with interest by furnishing usual undertaking and further permitted to withdraw 25% of the deposited amount along with interest by furnishing solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of Registrar (J) of this Court.