HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MADHUKAR S/O. BABU SHINDE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
APEAL 297/2017
Cri Appeal 297-2017
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 297 OF 2017
Madhukar s/o. Babu Shinde
age : 19 years, Occu: Agriculture,
r/o. Lakhangaon, Tq. Washi,
District Osmanabad.
...Appellant
versus
1.
The State of Maharashtra
through District Superintendent of Police,
Osmanabad.
2.
The Sub-Divisional Police Officer,
Sub-Division-Kalam,
Dist. Osmanabad.
3.
The Police Inspector,
Yarmala Police Station,
Tq. Kalam, Dist. Osmanabad.
...Respondents
.....
Mr. S. A. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. S.W. Munde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
.....
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE AND
V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
RESERVED ON : 05th JULY, 2018
PRONOUNCED ON : 31st JULY, 2018
JUDGMENT (PER V.K. JADHAV, J.) :-
.
Heard.
1.
Admit. With the consent of learned counsel for the respective
parties, the Appeal is taken up for final hearing.
Cri Appeal 297-2017
-2-
2.
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant/accused with the
following prayers:
b.
The impugned order passed below Exh.62 in Special
M.C.O.C.A. Case no. 4/2014 passed by the Special
M.C.O.C.A. Court Aurangabad on 6-6-2017 rejecting
the application of the appellant for discharge may kindly
be quashed and set aside.
c.
The application Exh.62 filed before the Special
M.C.O.C.A. Court Aurangabad in Special M.C.O.C.A.
Case no.4/2014 for discharge may kindly be allowed and
the appellant may kindly be discharged from Special
M.C.O.C.A. Case no.4/2014 in crime no.39/2014
(Special M.C.O.C.A. Case no.4/2014) for the offence u/s
396, 397, 364, 412, 201 of I.P.C. r/w 3(1) (i), (ii), 3(2),
3(4), 3(5) of M.C.O.C.A. Registered with Yarmala
police station, Ta. Kalam Dist. Osmanabad.
d.
During the pendency of the appeal, the trial of the
Special M.C.O.C.A. case no. 4/2014 pending before the
Special M.C.O.C.A. Court Aurangabad may kindly be
stayed.
3.
Brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows:
a.
The complainant Dinesh Kumar Ganeshan lodged a report at
Yarmala Police Station, District Osmanabad on 02.05.2014 stating
Cri Appeal 297-2017
-3-
therein that he was proceeding in a truck alongwith his assistant driver
Punrasu Kannan, from Salem (Tamil Nadu) to Bhilwada (Rajasthan)
for delivering 324 bags of sago (sabudana). During the journey, on
01.05.2014 at about 2.00 to 2.30 a.m., while they were 8 kms. ahead of
village Yedshi, one coffee coloured Bolero vehicle overtook their
truck and made them to stop it by parking their Bolero vehicle in front
the truck. Four persons alighted from the said vehicle holding wooden
rods in their hands and entered into the truck cabin, assaulted the
applicant and his assistant driver and took control of the truck. It is
further alleged in the F.I.R. that the four accused persons took the
truck towards Kalam while the Bolero vehicle was following them.
The accused persons stopped the truck 10 to 12 kms. ahead of Yarmala
square, snatched the mobile phones and cash amount of Rs.15,000/-
from the complainant and his assistant driver by threatening them, took
the complainant and his assistant driver into their Bolero car and threw
them in an empty well situated at the backside of Yedeshwari temple.
On the next day at about 11.00 am to 12.00 noon, when the
complainant gained consciousness, he found his assistant driver
missing. The complainant got out of the empty well and lodged report
with Yarmala Police Station where the offence under Sections 396,
397, 364, 412 and 201 of I.P.C. came to be registered.
Cri Appeal 297-2017
-4-
b.
The present appellant/accused came to be arrested in connection
with the aforesaid crime on 05.05.2014. On being produced before the
lear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.