BENCH AT AURANGABAD
R. M. Joshi, J
Sanvidhan s/o Punjaram Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's background and crime context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for bail based on charges. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and charges. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's final decision and rationale. (Para 7) |
1. Appellant has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the order of rejection of regular bail by learned Special Judge, Aurangabad in connection with Crime No. 195/2022 registered with CIDCO Police Station, Dist. Aurangabad for the offences punishable under Sections 302 , 143, 147, 148, 149, 120(B), 201, 114 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. First informant is the mother of deceased Manoj. She reported the incident dated 20th April, 2022. According to her, while she was at home with Manoj, one Satish Khare and fve to six persons came along with him and took Manoj under the pretext of tent work (Mandap). Later on she received a video indicating Manoj being assaulted after his hands and legs were tied. She came to Aurangabad and went to the house of Satish Khare at Siddharth Nagar, Aurangabad. No one was found there. They went to Mehawale Function Hall at N-12,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.