Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
SHRI JUSTICE R. N. LADDHA, J
THE EX. ENGINEER LOWER TERNA PROJECT, LATUR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's directive on acceptance of appeal. (Para 2) |
| 2. government resolutions influence compensation rates. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court clarifies interest on compensation based on legal precedents. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. final decision to dispose of the appeal and issue awards. (Para 12 , 13) |
2. This appeal is placed before today’s Lok Adalat with the consent of the parties.
3. Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, learned Advocate present for the Applicant. Mr. S. D. Burud, SDO LTP, Latur is present on behalf of Acquiring Body/State. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are represented by the learned Advocate Mr. V. T. Patil h/f Mr. R. V. Gore.
4. The learned Advocates for the Acquiring Body/State and the claimants fairly conceded that the Government of Maharashtra, vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/ pra.kra.4/Bham-1/A-4, dated 3rd November, 2016 with Government Corrigendums dated 23rd February, 2017 and 13th August, 2018 to the said Government Resolution, took decision to settle the appeal by accepting the market rates determined by the Reference Court, which are within the parameters set out in the Government Resolution. The statement made by the both the learned advocates is in consonance with t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
