BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
VISHWANTH UMAJI GARUDI – Appellant
Versus
BHIMRAO MUNJAJI JINTALWAD AND ORS – Respondent
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
SECOND APPEAL NO.783 OF 2009.
Vishwanath S/o Umaji Garudi
... Appellant.
Versus
Bhimrao S/o Munjaji Jintalwad
and others
... Respondents.
...
Mr.M.M.Patil (Beedkar), advocate for the
appellant.
Miss. S.S.Adkine, advocate holding for
Mr.S.K.Adkine, advocate for the Respondent No.1.
...
CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.
Date : 04.11.2009.
PER COURT
1.
This Second Appeal is preferred by the
original defendant.
2.
Heard learned counsel. Adjournment was
2
sought on behalf of the Respondents because
Mr.Adkine, advocate has gone out of Station.
Request rejected.
3.
The suit of the Respondents for removal
of encroachment (Vide RCS No.135/1986) came to be
decreed and the present appellant was directed to
deliver possession of encroached 26 Ares land.
It is pertinent to notice that the appellant had
already ventilated grievances in the earlier
round of litigation as regards the manner of
measurement. In previous round of litigation,
this Court held that lopsided measurement of the
plaintiff's land was improper and, therefore,
t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.