SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHANTILAL TARACHAND BOTHRA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MANTRI RAMESH R', 'BAGUL D S', '', 'G P', 'G P', 'AND', 'PATIL PRADIP R AND P A PISAL']

{1}

wp 7819.12.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.7819 OF 2012

Shantilal Tarachand Bothra

Age: 60 years, occu: Agri & Social service,

R/o Main Road, Chopda,

Dist. Jalgaon Petitioner

Versus

1

The State of Maharashtra

through:

1.i

The Principal Secretary,

Urban Development Department

1.ii

The Principal Secretary,

Public Works Department.

1.iii

The Principal Secretary,

Revenue & Forest Department

Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32

2

The Collector, Jalgaon.

3

The Planning Authority &

Municipal Council, Chopda

tq. Chopda, Dist. Jalgaon

4

The Assistant Director,

Town Planning Department,

Jalgaon.

Respondents

Mr.R.R. Mantri advocate for the petitioner

Mr.P.S. Patil Assistant Govt. Pleader for Respondents No.1, 2 & 4

Mr. P.R. Patil advocate for respondent No.3.

____________________________

{2}

wp 7819.12.odt

CO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top