SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDRAJEET APPARAO TANDALE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['GAIKWAD T G', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'KADAM S K', 'GP']

1

912c wp 8012.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 8012 OF 2016

Atmaram Bhujang Tandale

Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 8013 OF 2016

Meghraj Rambhau Ghule

Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 8014 OF 2016

Indrajeet Apparao Tandale

Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents

----

Mr. T.G. Gaikwad, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. A.P. Basarkar, AGP for respondent-state.

Mr. Kadam, Advocate for the respondents no. 2 to 4.

Mr. V.H. Solanke, Advocate for respondents no. 5, 6, 17, 18, 19, 20

& 22 in WP/8012/16, WP/8013/16 & WP/8014/16.

----

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 29-07-2016.

Per Court:

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

AGP appearing for respondents no. 1 and 3 and Mr. Kadam

appearing for respondents no. 2 and 4.

2

912c wp 8012.16.odt

2.

It appears that, in the present petitions candidates

whose nominations were accepted have been made parties and

have been attempted to be served who, according to instructions of

the learned coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top