SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MACHINDRA NARAYANRAO GHARAT – Appellant
Versus
LAXMAN KONDIBA BHOSALE AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['S G RUDRAWAR', 'CHAVARE PRABHU K ADV', '', 'R', '', '', 'amp; DISMISSED']

( 1 )

sa34.11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

SECOND APPEAL NO. 34 OF 2011

Machindra Narayanrao Gharat

..

Appellant

Versus

Dr. Laxman Kondiba Bhosale & Ors.

..

Respondents

Mr. G.O. Wattamwar h/f. Mr. S.G. Rudrawar, Advocate for

the appellant.

Mr. P.K. Chawre, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1,3,6 to 8.

WITH

SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 22883 OF 2008

Adv. Shivaji s/o. Baburao Shinde & Ors.

..

Appellants

Versus

Dr. Laxman Kondiba Bhosale & Ors.

..

Respondents

Mr. G.O. Wattamwar h/f. Mr. S.G. Rudrawar, Advocate for

the appellant.

Mr. P.K. Chawre, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1,3,7to9.

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J.

DATED :

20.01.2012

P.C. :-

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Learned

Counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that

there was no any direction by this Court in First Appeal

( 2 )

sa34.11

No. 108 of 1987 to frame any scheme. Learned Counsel for

the appellants was when confronted with query that

whether he has copy of said order passed in said appeal,

he submits that said copy is not produced on record as he

does not possess said copy of order. He submits that

said First Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top