SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BHARAT NAMDEVRAO HATMODE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['PATIL SHASHIKIRAN N', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'TELE ASHOK B', 'GP', 'R & SERVED']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 7481 OF 2014

BHARAT NAMDEVRAO HATMODE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.N.Patil

AGP for Respondents 1,4 : Mr. K.J.Ghute Patil

Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr. A.B. Tele

Advocate for Respondent 3 : Mr. R.S.Kasar

...

CORAM : S V GANGAPURWALA & V.K. JADHAV, JJ.

Dated: October 29, 2014

...

PER COURT :-

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the

consent of parties, taken up for final hearing.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his

Tribe certificate has been cancelled and confiscated by the

committee on the ground that the authority issued the said

certificate had no jurisdiction. According to the learned counsel

said oder is passed without hearing to the petitioner and without

notice to the petitioner.

3.

Mr. Tele, the learned counsel for respondent no.2

submits that documents on record were crystal clear pursuant to

which no other view was possible. Committee has rightly decided

the same.

4.

It is the cardinal and fundamental principal of

jurisprudence that when an order adverse to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top