BHARAT NAMDEVRAO HATMODE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7481 OF 2014
BHARAT NAMDEVRAO HATMODE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.N.Patil
AGP for Respondents 1,4 : Mr. K.J.Ghute Patil
Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr. A.B. Tele
Advocate for Respondent 3 : Mr. R.S.Kasar
...
CORAM : S V GANGAPURWALA & V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
Dated: October 29, 2014
...
PER COURT :-
1.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the
consent of parties, taken up for final hearing.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his
Tribe certificate has been cancelled and confiscated by the
committee on the ground that the authority issued the said
certificate had no jurisdiction. According to the learned counsel
said oder is passed without hearing to the petitioner and without
notice to the petitioner.
3.
Mr. Tele, the learned counsel for respondent no.2
submits that documents on record were crystal clear pursuant to
which no other view was possible. Committee has rightly decided
the same.
4.
It is the cardinal and fundamental principal of
jurisprudence that when an order adverse to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.