HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
NARENDRA MADANRAO ZAMBRE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR – Respondent
WP 820/2008
['V D SALUNKE', '', 'SJ SALUNKE', 'CHOUDHARY S S AND A JAGTAP', '', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', 'PP', 'R/ SERVED']
( 1 )
crwp820.08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 820 OF 2008
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3996 OF 2017
Dr. Narendra s/o. Madanrao Zambre,
..
Petitioner
Age. 35 years, Occ. Service,
R/o. Baramati, Tq. Baramati,
Dist. Pune.
Versus
1.
The State of Maharashtra
..
Respondents
Through Police Station, Tuljapur,
Dist. Osmanabad.
2.
Subhash s/o. Bhagwatrao Salunke,
Age. 51 years, Occ. Agri.,
R/o. Kati, Tq. Tuljapur,
Dist. Osmanabad.
Mr.V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.S.D. Ghayal, A.P.P. for respondent No.1/State.
Mr.S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :
06.09.2017
J U D G M E N T [PER : T.V. NALAWADE,J.] :-
1.
This petition is filed for the relief of
quashing of F.I.R. in M.Case No.14 of 2008 dated
13.04.2008, registered with Tuljapur Police Station,
( 2 )
crwp820.08
Dist. Osmanabad. The crime is registered on the basis of
directions given by the learned Judicial Magistrate,
First Class, Tuljapur, under section 156(3) of the Code
of Criminal Procedure in Misc. Proceeding No.89 of 2008.
The private complaint was filed for offences punishable
under section 166, 167, 420, 466, 468, 469, 471 read with
section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In Criminal
Application No.3996 of 2017, filed in this Court, the
permission is sought by the original complainant to
produce some documents, which are in relation to the
dispute between the original complainant and one of the
accused persons. Both the sides are heard.
2.
It is the case of the complainant that on
27.01.1992 under registered sale-deed, he purchased land
admeasuring 7 H 86 R from Gat No.858 situated at village
Kati from Yojanadevi Deshmukh. In the past Yojanadevi
was owner of Survey No.322 admeasuring 11 H 34 R. Under
sale deed dated 27.04.1982 accused No.5-Amarsinha
Nimbalkar had purchased 10 Acres 16 Gunthas land from
( 3 )
crwp820.08
Yojanadevi for consideration of Rs.17,000/-. After the
transaction with Nimbalkar, Survey No.322 was divided
into pot-hissa and Survey No.322/1 was the number given
to the portion purchased by Nimbalkar. To the remaining
portion, Survey No.322/2 was given and that remained with
Yojanadevi. Its size was 7 H 14 R.
3.
After purchasing the aforesaid portion by
Nimbalkar, consolidation scheme was implemented in the
village. The land purchased by Nimbalkar was given Gat
No.859.
4.
Land Survey No.322/2, which was with Yojanadevi
and other land Survey No.323 having area of 72 R were
consolidated and to this consolidated portion Gat No.858
was given in or about year 1987-88. Thus, in the year
1992 when the complainant purchased land from Yojanadevi,
she was owner of land Gat No.858.
5.
Regular Civil Suit No.204 of 2000 was filed in
( 4 )
crwp820.08
the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Tuljapur by
the complainant - Subhash Salunke for removal of
encroachment allegedly made by Nimbalkar on land Gat
No.858. When this suit was pending, Nimbalkar made
application to the Dy. Director of Land Record,
Aurangabad on 02.07.2003. He contended that he had
purchased land admeasuring 10 Acres 16 Gunthas under
sale-deed of 1982. He contended that at the time of
implementation of consolidation scheme, the measurements
were not taken as per the actual possession. He
contended that as the measurement was not made as per
actual possession, wrong map of new lands bearing Gat
numbers was created. He admitted that in the year 1993,
there was measurement made on the basis of sale-deed
executed in favour of complainant and he contended that
at that time wrong report was prepared and it was wrongly
shown that he had made encroachment. He had prayed in the
application to show the